<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stealing from Jeff:  XHTML vs. HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perpetualbeta.com/release/2006/09/stealing-from-jeff-xhtml-vs-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perpetualbeta.com/release/2006/09/stealing-from-jeff-xhtml-vs-html/</link>
	<description>ready... aim...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nedsferatu</title>
		<link>http://perpetualbeta.com/release/2006/09/stealing-from-jeff-xhtml-vs-html/comment-page-1/#comment-4838</link>
		<dc:creator>Nedsferatu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perpetualbeta.com/release/archives/2006/09/28/stealing-from-jeff-xhtml-vs-html/#comment-4838</guid>
		<description>Well you can always sniff for the browser. I have used this great php script that builds the first 5 or 6 lines of your site from scratch.

another reason why xhtml sites don&#039;t validate is that if you have any user input data, or very much dynamic content at all, it&#039;s very hard to make sure every tee is crossed and every eye dotted. it is the static page crusaders who end up with the validating sites.

I do agree that many many people don&#039;t know what a mime is or how to use it and could benefit in a lesson on http. good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you can always sniff for the browser. I have used this great php script that builds the first 5 or 6 lines of your site from scratch.</p>
<p>another reason why xhtml sites don&#8217;t validate is that if you have any user input data, or very much dynamic content at all, it&#8217;s very hard to make sure every tee is crossed and every eye dotted. it is the static page crusaders who end up with the validating sites.</p>
<p>I do agree that many many people don&#8217;t know what a mime is or how to use it and could benefit in a lesson on http. good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nedsferatu</title>
		<link>http://perpetualbeta.com/release/2006/09/stealing-from-jeff-xhtml-vs-html/comment-page-1/#comment-23304</link>
		<dc:creator>Nedsferatu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perpetualbeta.com/release/archives/2006/09/28/stealing-from-jeff-xhtml-vs-html/#comment-23304</guid>
		<description>Well you can always sniff for the browser. I have used this great php script that builds the first 5 or 6 lines of your site from scratch.

another reason why xhtml sites don&#039;t validate is that if you have any user input data, or very much dynamic content at all, it&#039;s very hard to make sure every tee is crossed and every eye dotted. it is the static page crusaders who end up with the validating sites.

I do agree that many many people don&#039;t know what a mime is or how to use it and could benefit in a lesson on http. good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you can always sniff for the browser. I have used this great php script that builds the first 5 or 6 lines of your site from scratch.</p>
<p>another reason why xhtml sites don&#8217;t validate is that if you have any user input data, or very much dynamic content at all, it&#8217;s very hard to make sure every tee is crossed and every eye dotted. it is the static page crusaders who end up with the validating sites.</p>
<p>I do agree that many many people don&#8217;t know what a mime is or how to use it and could benefit in a lesson on http. good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.263 seconds -->

