Stealing from Jeff: XHTML vs. HTML


For the time being I’m only stealing links from Jeff.

He helpfully points out some recent work showing that most so-called “valid XHTML” really is no such thing.

These sources have more on why:

One big reason: there’s no good way to serve XHTML to all browsers with a valid MIME type. And that apparently matters.

(If this post means absolutely nothing to you, then congratulations, it means you have a life and don’t have to worry about this kind of stuff. Say hi to the world for me.)

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Voting for Foley
Detainee Dilemma

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Well you can always sniff for the browser. I have used this great php script that builds the first 5 or 6 lines of your site from scratch.

another reason why xhtml sites don’t validate is that if you have any user input data, or very much dynamic content at all, it’s very hard to make sure every tee is crossed and every eye dotted. it is the static page crusaders who end up with the validating sites.

I do agree that many many people don’t know what a mime is or how to use it and could benefit in a lesson on http. good stuff!